From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug spam Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:59:54 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87iqb5o7ie.fsf@red-bean.com> <878wc1h524.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <874omph4f0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87pr5dmqfw.fsf@red-bean.com> <877hrl1m5m.fsf@telefonica.net> <86hbqpctyh.fsf_-_@fencepost.gnu.org> <19279.20828.784450.411540@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263528051 2401 80.91.229.12 (15 Jan 2010 04:00:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 04:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, Karl Fogel , Emacs developers To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 15 05:00:43 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVdMZ-0007MW-0f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 05:00:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57393 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVdMZ-0005Gb-Mh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:00:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVdLr-0004oe-St for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:59:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVdLn-0004jD-5G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:59:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46160 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVdLn-0004j4-0m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:59:55 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:57366) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVdLm-0002uv-Nh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:59:54 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NVdLm-0007AI-GU; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:59:54 -0500 X-Spook: CipherTAC-2000 e-cash UNSCOM Marxist Nazi CBNRC import X-Ran: )+=0@5\ZVYN&KBl\ZkyUy~l]VN+t$k_e12LER|}aqXdRdXh_o%XcnJ List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120043 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >> PS. How about auto-discarding mail sent to >> [0-9]-(close|done)@emacsbugs ? > > Sounds fine, tho I don't think it's a large enough fraction to make > a significant difference. Of 2160 moderation messages in the past week: 1951 were for mails sent to emacsbugs addresses (90%) 466 were for mails sent to done|close@emacsbugs (22%) But it's probably a bad idea to think this way.