From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: fencepost is fucked; anyone know what's going on? Date: 07 Aug 2003 15:40:45 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87brv29vct.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1060263839 10365 80.91.224.253 (7 Aug 2003 13:43:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 13:43:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 07 15:44:20 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19kl40-00019a-00 for ; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 15:44:20 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19kl9T-00014J-00 for ; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 15:49:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19kl1P-0007vA-3i for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 09:41:39 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19kl18-0007uz-MT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 09:41:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19kl0c-0007mE-1B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 09:41:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.226.12.186] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19kl0b-0007l8-4O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 09:40:49 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h77Dek6O003337 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Aug 2003 15:40:46 +0200 Original-Received: (from dak@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h77DejSd003333; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 15:40:45 +0200 Original-To: bob@rattlesnake.com In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 28 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:15830 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:15830 "Robert J. Chassell" writes: > Miles Bader asks > > Has anyone had their account re-enabled yet? I got the call from the > FSF to confirm my ssh info two days ago, but still can't login to > fencepost via ssh, and email goes unanswered. I'm starting to wonder > if there's something else wrong with my setup. > > I have confirmed the new fencepost host id; I have not received a > telephone call; and I am not able to log in: > > $ date +"%a, %Y %h %e %H:%M:%S %Z" ; ssh -l bob fencepost.gnu.org > Thu, 2003 Aug 7 12:52:07 UTC > Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). Which was the state of affairs till yesterday for me as well. There seemingly is a large number of accounts to deal with, and not much of a standard procedure or manpower for dealing with a case like that fast enough for everyone's comfort. Unless matters are very urgent for you (I had important mail piling up that I could not access, dak@gnu.org being my principal account), I would wait a few days more. Remember that the usual autoreply from accounts@gnu.org tells you to wait for three business days for a reaction, and that is for the case where not every account has gone off disabled at the same time. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum