From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David.Kastrup@t-online.de (David Kastrup) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: Bug#139792: emacs21: Press PageDown, get infinite loop Date: 16 Apr 2002 14:39:29 +0200 Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <5573-Tue16Apr2002151417+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1018960950 13107 127.0.0.1 (16 Apr 2002 12:42:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 12:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16xSI1-0003PI-00 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 14:42:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16xSI7-0000sL-00; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 08:42:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout05.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.82]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16xSFV-0000ef-00 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 08:39:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fwd10.sul.t-online.de by mailout05.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 16xSFP-0000yk-03; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 14:39:47 +0200 Original-Received: from tupik.goethe.zz (520018396234-0001@[62.226.12.152]) by fwd10.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 16xSF9-1IOKUiC; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 14:39:31 +0200 Original-Received: (from dak@localhost) by tupik.goethe.zz (8.11.6/linuxconf) id g3GCdUZ01638; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 14:39:30 +0200 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <5573-Tue16Apr2002151417+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> Original-Lines: 29 X-Sender: 520018396234-0001@t-dialin.net Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:706 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:706 "Eli Zaretskii" writes: > > From: David.Kastrup@t-online.de (David Kastrup) > > Date: 16 Apr 2002 12:21:30 +0200 > > > > > > X11, Apache or TeX are not part of Unix, they just run under it. > > > > > > That's debatable. A system without those components would be much > > > less useful than with them. I.e. it would be much less of ``a > > > system''. > > > > Debatable? [...] it is > > debatable whether "Unix" should not encompass everything that may be > > made to run under it? > > No, it is debatable whether a system without those components > deserves to be called a ``system''. > > > For somone that already cried "foul!" > > I did? You defended someone who did. It does not make much sense to defend the arguments of somebody with something inconsistent with them, unless you intend to discredit him by reductio ad absurdum. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum Email: David.Kastrup@t-online.de