From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: dired-do-hardlink should update link count we see Date: 09 Jul 2002 18:26:54 +0200 Organization: T-Online Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87eleemkdl.fsf@jidanni.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026231987 10723 127.0.0.1 (9 Jul 2002 16:26:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 16:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Rxop-0002mq-00 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 18:26:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17RxpW-0004H5-00; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 12:27:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.20]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17RxpJ-0004Gi-00 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 12:26:57 -0400 Original-Received: from imh00.t-online.com by mailout08.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 17RxpH-0003lJ-00; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 18:26:55 +0200 Original-Received: from news.t-online.com by imh00.t-online.com with esmtp id 17RxpH-0000Zo-00; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 18:26:55 +0200 Original-Received: from news by news.t-online.com with local id 17RxpG-0001dC-00; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 18:26:54 +0200 Original-To: gnu-emacs-bug@prep.ai.mit.edu Original-Path: news.t-online.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1026232014 03 5523 TlcYbC-STMA+m2 020709 16:26:54 Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.com X-Sender: 520018396234-0001@t-dialin.net X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6,xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN;i";/yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:2559 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:2559 eliz@is.elta.co.il (Eli Zaretskii) writes: > On 9 Jul 2002, David Kastrup wrote: > > > It is perfectly understandable if one thinks some things not worth > > fixing or doing correctly. > > I didn't say this isn't worth fixing, I just pointed out that it's a > part of a general pattern. Oh, surely, surely. Other operations (like changing permissions, the file name, moving files, copying them) update the info in the dired buffer without actually rereading the directory info, so the general pattern would certainly imply that updating the info in the dired buffer without actually rereading the directory info would be something entirely different. Again, if you are planning to make sense, you better try harder. And just removing all relevant context from posts of mine (which you have now done two times already) in order to repeat your unsubstantiated claim is starting to look silly. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum Email: David.Kastrup@t-online.de