From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David.Kastrup@t-online.de (David Kastrup) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Any idea about what makes Emacs slow reading on pipes? Date: 16 May 2003 20:49:00 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <3EC51D6A.3070804@yahoo.com> <3EC53026.9070400@yahoo.com> Reply-To: dak@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1053111397 31589 80.91.224.249 (16 May 2003 18:56:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 18:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri May 16 20:56:34 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19GkJw-0007tJ-00 for ; Fri, 16 May 2003 20:52:44 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19GkSP-0007pj-00 for ; Fri, 16 May 2003 21:01:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19GkJ0-0004yt-06 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 16 May 2003 14:51:46 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19GkH3-0003yy-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2003 14:49:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19GkGz-0003xU-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2003 14:49:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.19]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19GkGZ-0003iL-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 May 2003 14:49:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fwd03.sul.t-online.de by mailout06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 19GkGY-00065q-01; Fri, 16 May 2003 20:49:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (520018396234-0001@[62.226.11.196]) by fwd03.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 19GkGM-0GRuOeC; Fri, 16 May 2003 20:49:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h4GIn12l032332; Fri, 16 May 2003 20:49:01 +0200 Original-Received: (from dak@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h4GIn0KH032328; Fri, 16 May 2003 20:49:00 +0200 Original-To: Kevin Rodgers In-Reply-To: <3EC53026.9070400@yahoo.com> Original-Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-Sender: 520018396234-0001@t-dialin.net X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:13940 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:13940 Kevin Rodgers writes: > David Kastrup wrote: > > > Probably od -h -v or something. The point was just fast producing > > large amounts of more or less reproducable text. > > > Using "od -v" runs fast from the start on GNU Emacs 21.3.1 > (i386-pc-solaris2.7, X toolkit). What's the distribution of filter lengths with the separate test program I posted? Something less extreme than switching between 1 and 1024? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum