From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: David.Kastrup@t-online.de (David Kastrup)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: Re: format hex numbers
Date: 31 Mar 2002 15:08:17 +0200
Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <x5ofh46g1q.fsf@tupik.goethe.zz>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020331155003.17308B@is>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017580161 18647 127.0.0.1 (31 Mar 2002 13:09:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 13:09:21 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16rf5F-0004qe-00
	for <gnu-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 15:09:21 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16rf5A-0000LI-00; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 08:09:16 -0500
Original-Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.20])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16rf4O-0000Jo-00
	for <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 08:08:28 -0500
Original-Received: from fwd00.sul.t-online.de 
	by mailout08.sul.t-online.com with smtp 
	id 16rf4L-0001uw-00; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 15:08:25 +0200
Original-Received: from tupik.goethe.zz (520018396234-0001@[62.226.12.186]) by fwd00.sul.t-online.com
	with esmtp id 16rf4L-1Y2BzUC; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 15:08:25 +0200
Original-Received: (from dak@localhost)
	by tupik.goethe.zz (8.11.6/linuxconf) id g2VD8Iu01762;
	Sun, 31 Mar 2002 15:08:18 +0200
Original-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020331155003.17308B@is>
Original-Lines: 24
X-Sender: 520018396234-0001@t-dialin.net
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
	the Swiss army knife of text editors <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-gnu-emacs/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:330
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:330

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:

> On 31 Mar 2002, David Kastrup wrote:
> 
> > By the way, the last few recent bug reports I sent with Emacs CVS
> > never solicited one peep of a response.  Is emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
> > a dead address by now?
> 
> It's not dead; I've seen those messages.  I guess no one had time to work 
> on your reports yet, or maybe just didn't reply.

BTW, what is the difference in circulation between bug-gnu-emacs and
emacs-pretest-bug?  The former is also gatewayed to gnu.emacs.bug,
that much I know.  I am just trying to find out what bug should best
be sent to which list.

Are the lists and the progress on individual reports logged
somewhere?

Thanks,

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
Email: David.Kastrup@t-online.de