From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Layout of Emacs manual top mode in Info Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:49:49 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200503290101.j2T118O26547@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112087887 30981 80.91.229.2 (29 Mar 2005 09:18:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 29 11:18:03 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGCqy-0008L4-Q9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:17:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGD7E-0002Hd-QC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 04:34:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DGCjP-00046e-I7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 04:09:52 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DGCjM-00042f-0c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 04:09:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGCjL-0003os-4D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 04:09:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DGCQ1-0002DK-1j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 03:49:49 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DGCQ0-0002SM-Lx; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 03:49:48 -0500 Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-Reply-To: <200503290101.j2T118O26547@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (Luc Teirlinck's message of "Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:01:08 -0600 (CST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35292 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35292 Luc Teirlinck writes: > David Kastrup wrote: > > Here are some other nodes which are really inferiors of the ones > already listed, mentioned here so you can get to them in one step: > > --- The Detailed Node Listing --- > > appears without any fontification, highlighting, boldface or other > offsetting, thus being much less conspicuous than the many > _subordinate_ headings before or after. > > Apoparently, in reaction to this @section was used. But one can not > use @section in the middle of a menu. Just take a look at how the > node looks right now after the detailed listing starts. It is > completely messed up. Richard asked me about this in private, and after taking a look at it, I recommended rather going for @subsection (which is the right size here) because @section appeared _too_ large. I did not notice the messup, but it also appears with @subsection. Now what? I don't think there can be more than one menu per node, right? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum