all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: juri@jurta.org, lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se,
	teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?)
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:10:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <x5acovnp55.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1DDuDK-0007M7-Rw@fencepost.gnu.org> (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:59:14 -0500")

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

>     It would be wrong for preview-latex, probably one of the most
>     important applications extensively using the display property.
>
> With all due respect, I have not been shown a reason to consider
> that package tremendously important.  All user program are important
> to some extent, but I don't see why this one should be overridingly
> so.

Oh, I was not as immodest to claim one of the most important
applications whatsoever, but only among a particular subset.  It
actually happens to be rather easy to be "one of the most important
applications [among those that are] _extensively_ using the display
property", since there are not many of them.  The only other one I can
think of right now would be w3, and development of that appears pretty
much stagnant.

Just ask Gerd what application produced the most bug reports in the
betatest of Emacs-21.1 concerning the display property...

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-23  1:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-21 13:20 Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?) Lennart Borgman
2005-03-21 13:49 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-21 14:00   ` Lennart Borgman
2005-03-21 19:27     ` Juri Linkov
2005-03-21 20:18       ` David Kastrup
2005-03-22 13:57       ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-22 14:46         ` David Kastrup
2005-03-22 17:29           ` Juri Linkov
2005-03-22 22:22             ` David Kastrup
2005-03-23  6:21             ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-23 13:08               ` Juri Linkov
2005-03-23 14:19                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-23 15:19                   ` Juri Linkov
2005-03-23 17:03                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-23 20:21                       ` Juri Linkov
2005-03-23 20:33                         ` Stefan Monnier
2005-03-23 21:16                         ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-23 21:42                           ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-23 22:54                             ` Kim F. Storm
2005-03-24  1:18                               ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-25  6:42                               ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-23 21:44                           ` Drew Adams
2005-03-24  0:21                           ` Juri Linkov
2005-03-24  1:12                             ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-25  6:41                           ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-23 21:30                         ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-24  5:18                       ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-23 20:26                 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-24  0:19                   ` Juri Linkov
2005-03-25  6:42                     ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-23  0:59           ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-23  1:10             ` David Kastrup [this message]
2005-03-23 10:07               ` Kim F. Storm
2005-03-23 11:01                 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-23 22:57                   ` Kim F. Storm
2005-03-23 23:00                   ` Kim F. Storm
2005-03-23 23:57                     ` David Kastrup
2005-03-25  6:42                     ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-23 12:59                 ` Juri Linkov
2005-08-10  0:19       ` Drew Adams
2005-08-10  3:42         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-10  4:19           ` Drew Adams
2005-08-10  4:03         ` Juri Linkov
2005-03-21 23:20   ` Drew Adams
2005-03-22  4:57     ` Miles Bader
2005-03-22 10:51       ` David Kastrup

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=x5acovnp55.fsf@lola.goethe.zz \
    --to=dak@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=juri@jurta.org \
    --cc=lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se \
    --cc=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.