From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: match-data aborts on mac os x Date: 15 Jul 2004 02:31:19 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <8BD2A419-D5D7-11D8-B79A-000D93AD2E12@lunch.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1089851508 6323 80.91.224.253 (15 Jul 2004 00:31:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 00:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 15 02:31:39 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bku9z-0005yc-00 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 02:31:39 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bku9z-0003g9-00 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 02:31:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BkuCQ-0005Gu-Vi for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:34:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BkuCJ-0005Go-HP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BkuCJ-0005Gc-3Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BkuCJ-0005GZ-0O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bku9h-0000AH-IA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:31:21 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bku9h-0006zd-0B; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:31:21 -0400 Original-To: bryan o'connor In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 26 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:25709 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:25709 bryan o'connor writes: > > What about "your search.c is newer than that?" did you not > > understand? I just went on bug search for hours and now on > > rereading all posts for further hints I finally notice that you > > did not even bother to get the version I explicitly told you had > > relevant fixes in it. > > i thought my first post was clear, my initial bug report was based > on a fresh cvs version from today. > > i explicitly tested 6/28 to show that the 6/29 and 6/30 changes did > not introduce the bug. Then that was a misunderstanding. Those changes _fixed_ a similar bug, I was not expecting them to be the cause of it. You are positive that you have not accidentally missed out on a recompilation or whatever else when reporting the problem with the current CVS? Anyway, I don't have slime here. It would appear that the data structure it passes to set-match-data is rejected. Can you verify in the source whether all calls to set-match-data operate with unmodified data from a call of match-data? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum