From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is Emacs becoming Word? Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:37:44 +0100 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: References: <20050325180531.GB16586@dionysus.ucolick.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111794334 20420 80.91.229.2 (25 Mar 2005 23:45:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 23:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 26 00:45:34 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DEyUT-0008Pf-0l for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:45:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DEyk2-0002GX-Rq for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:01:26 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 34 Original-X-Trace: individual.net JPNF/jwpZESdbiQaQitL/gEI4tC6zBWzM7Kn/zp7mM+JWIBJEG X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:XeUVQ4huVpbkTppb2YlaxT+y17s= Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:129617 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:25169 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:25169 Joe Corneli writes: > I don't think that it tells you to do > > (setq font-lock-maximum-decoration '((tex-mode . 2) (latex-mode . 2) (t . t))) > > in order to have latex buffers look "normal", so I think that's one. Well, it says ** TeX modes: [...] *** verbatim environments are now highlighted in courier by font-lock and super/sub-scripts are made into super/sub-scripts. so the feature _is_ announced, although not how to remove it. And I don't see it in the Emacs manual. Would you be so kind as to file a bug report? I could imagine that some people find that annoying, but am not the right judge because I don't use font lock in the first place. > The stuff about "undo" is in there, but seem to explain how to make > the messages go away (and have undo information always discarded > automatically, which is the best thing I can think of to do with > it). > > These are perhaps the two most noticable changes to Emacs I've seen > over recent months. If you have a particular suggestion how to improve the documentation, you should send it to emacs-devel at gnu.org. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum