From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r99831: Scrolling commands which does not signal errors at top/bottom. Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 00:16:04 +0200 Message-ID: References: <874ojozp27.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87ljd0wcw3.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <876344wamo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <874ojn8eqf.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270678595 3714 80.91.229.12 (7 Apr 2010 22:16:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 22:16:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 08 00:16:34 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzdY1-0007yd-W4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:16:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58064 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NzdY1-0002Sv-Do for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:16:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NzdXx-0002SH-5U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:16:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52371 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NzdXv-0002S8-Ub for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:16:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzdXu-0001Fm-OC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:16:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f223.google.com ([209.85.218.223]:58673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzdXu-0001Fd-Ig for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:16:26 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so1354927bwz.26 for ; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:16:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+bZeTLIhdzVw9j9KWv/y96IwaXy9tD9bAJ8yKTA7EOA=; b=L96XDkQkVXxGLRzDViXcQk0GwW114lGVOUwv6HzDdyjVF6Y0khGhMKBw+zC9ViUNyE pQkaqVWdZEKn7JAkNvB6Yn5F52Sm/CHAIuV3UL+vnVYtQkYaMYQgP6PNIM7BwWSIehJM JLLkHntGLlLlf5xQJHyHinOALkNCIfEz/kRzM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LWLH87WSdNhZKQpK/G+DOV/w2zKlWxFTA+caYPyh9XYOylzj3RAILXPUn/ti+/wYuW NrGIw5gaEERYFuzLZSV4UKaz8sN3HVe3nolPSxutR/2M9D6B3quTyDYHsJGm/C9cVB7v eBaLdJjWXq5gjJuyffAe8aQmGboWflPLzi3rQ= Original-Received: by 10.204.136.15 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 15:16:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874ojn8eqf.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Original-Received: by 10.204.126.84 with SMTP id b20mr10086630bks.61.1270678584153; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:16:24 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123338 Archived-At: > `mwheel-scroll' disobeys `scroll-preserve-screen-position' too. I would consider that a bug, too. The docstring for `scroll-preserve-screen-position' does talk about "scroll commands". The reason the option exists, I think, is because some of us find the non-preserving behavior quite unbearable (I used Mikael Sj=C3=B6din's pager.el for years because I found the standard scroll-(up|down) commands almost unusable). > I think > it would be wrong to add all possible scrolling commands to this code: Why? Perhaps it should be implemented differently, but that's not the same as being "wrong". Juanma