From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4236: 23.1.50; broken MacOS X port: times out, flashing a centered rectangle Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:04:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <210BB99D-985D-41FF-B963-FF33C4CFBD79@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310414803 23039 80.91.229.12 (11 Jul 2011 20:06:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:06:43 +0000 (UTC) To: 4236-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 11 22:06:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgMkV-0004cK-9u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:06:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38597 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgMkU-0005uj-34 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:06:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57976) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgMk2-0005sF-P5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:06:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgMjz-00010e-Ay for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:06:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59730) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgMjy-00010R-MA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgMjy-0002pP-Ke for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:06:02 -0400 Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 4236 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,ns X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Mail-Followup-To: 4236@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 4236-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D4236.131041470410796 (code D ref 4236); Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4236-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2011 20:05:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgMj1-0002o5-H7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:05:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgMix-0002nS-Sd for 4236-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:05:01 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55216) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgMir-00017J-R2; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:04:54 -0400 X-Spook: undercover ANC New World Order AMW cryptographic Arnett X-Ran: `|~]p(;Lb{5*GfN6JOvOmO?&]77~bGFAp<|QCt|c{M (Adrian Robert's message of "Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:40:19 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:06:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48643 Archived-At: I'm closing this because without the requested information (see below), nothing can be done. If it still happens, then if you reply with said info the bug can be reopened if needed. Adrian Robert wrote: > I'm afraid we would need to have this narrowed down some more to be > able to fix it. You could try running with -Q and then loading the > file and eval'ing it section by section. You could either go line-by- > line or do a binary bisection -- evaluate the entire first half of the > file, if it crashes then restart and do just the first quarter, etc..