From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc. Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:14:06 +0900 Organization: Faculty of Science, Chiba University Message-ID: References: <20061211.233142.146367996.mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> <20061212.223242.258196916.mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> <87slfddurm.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166494483 31416 80.91.229.2 (19 Dec 2006 02:14:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 02:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, "Kim F. Storm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 19 03:14:41 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwUUv-0001pC-Cv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 03:14:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwUUu-0005an-Oq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:14:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GwUUi-0005ag-63 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:14:16 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GwUUh-0005aS-4l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:14:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwUUh-0005aN-0U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:14:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [133.82.132.2] (helo=mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GwUUc-0001H3-Ue; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:14:11 -0500 Original-Received: from church.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (church [133.82.132.36]) by mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1FB2CB7; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:14:06 +0900 (JST) Original-To: Chong Yidong In-Reply-To: <87slfddurm.fsf@stupidchicken.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.0.91 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63944 Archived-At: >>>>> On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:38:21 -0500, Chong Yidong said: > storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: >> So I would rather redefine them to single events (named sigusr1 and >> sigusr2 as those names are already known to the signal-process >> function), and handle them through special-event-map as you >> suggested. > In that case, is there a rationale for the rather large changes > checked into emacs.c, keyboard.c, and process.c over the last two > weeks? Should they not be reverted? Do the "large changes" you think should be reverted include my 2006-12-14 changes? These changes are not for the event format but for fixing a problem that has existed for a long time. That is, about calling a non-reentrant function in a signal handler context while it is executed in a normal context. YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp