From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch? Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 12:45:04 +0900 Organization: Faculty of Science, Chiba University Message-ID: References: <4A692E0A.9060108@gnu.org> <87zlasunm0.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1248579931 16851 80.91.229.12 (26 Jul 2009 03:45:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 03:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: adrian.b.robert@gmail.com, jasonr@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 26 05:45:24 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MUufq-00037H-JW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:45:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34789 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MUufp-0005oz-Mr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 23:45:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MUufl-0005mP-AQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 23:45:17 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MUufh-0005dr-08 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 23:45:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60352 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MUufg-0005dc-NW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 23:45:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp ([133.82.132.2]:63866) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MUufb-0005Ym-HK; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 23:45:08 -0400 Original-Received: from church.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (church [133.82.132.36]) by mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8796C2C40; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 12:45:04 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <87zlasunm0.fsf@catnip.gol.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: NetBSD 3.0 (DF) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113153 Archived-At: >>>>> On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 12:31:03 +0900, Miles Bader said: >>> An incorrect implementation of stippling is somewhat of a bug, but >>> it might be better than no implementation of stippling. Anyway, I >>> don't see a reason to object that this is only on MacOS. > Note that stippling has never really worked correctly even on X. > [I fixed some of the bugs on my tiling branch, as the issues are > similar to those of image backgrounds.] Yes, that's one of the reasons I didn't try to implement stippling on the Carbon port: I expected that inclusion of the tiling patch would make the whole situation much nicer and also make it possible to port both stippling and tiling in a cleaner way. FWIW, the W32 port doesn't have implementation of stippling either. Keeping a wrong implementation of stippling in the NS port doesn't make any sense. YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp