From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest? Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:39:32 +0900 Organization: Faculty of Science, Chiba University Message-ID: References: <87k5y83e3a.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87zm6wmt4s.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173919253 17310 80.91.229.12 (15 Mar 2007 00:40:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:40:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Piet van Oostrum Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 15 01:40:47 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HRe1P-0001Lp-19 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:40:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HRe2L-0008PJ-1j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:41:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HRe1I-00070S-0v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:40:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HRe1G-0006x9-2j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:40:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HRe1F-0006wr-Sc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:40:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp ([133.82.132.2]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HRe0H-0001Eu-VG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:39:38 -0400 Original-Received: from church.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (church [133.82.132.36]) by mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1603E2C95; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:39:33 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.0.95 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-detected-kernel: NetBSD 3.0 (DF) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67947 Archived-At: >>>>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:21:20 +0100, Piet van Oostrum said: >>>>> Richard Stallman (RS) wrote: RS> Do you get a useful backtrace this time? > Sorry, I didn't mean I had a new lockup at that time. But as the > problem has not yet been identified it is to be expected that > another one will appear in a finite time. In principle, that can happen. As I said previously (*1), there are still some library functions that may call malloc-related functions internally but their calls are not pretected by BLOCK_INPUT: getc, ungetc, fwrite, fclose, getaddrinfo, freeaddrinfo (*1) http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-01/msg00125.html > However, yesterday I had another kind of lockup. I was trying to get > new email (I use VM for reading mail) and my emacs completely > hung. It wouldn't even react to C-g. You cannot quit with C-g if inhibit-quit is non-nil (*2). Can you check the values of Vinhibit_quit and Qnil if you still have the debugging session? (*2) http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-pretest-bug/2006-06/msg00320.html YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp