From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7296: display-pixel-height not enough Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 09:56:08 +0900 Organization: Faculty of Science, Chiba University Message-ID: References: <83hbg66vt4.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3qt77lj.fsf@gnu.org> <4CCA9E5D.5060002@swipnet.se> <838w1h6zbp.fsf@gnu.org> <4CCAC90B.4070800@swipnet.se> <4CCB2713.5070104@swipnet.se> <4CCBC930.5060705@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288575033 27567 80.91.229.12 (1 Nov 2010 01:30:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 01:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jan@debbugs.gnu.org, 7296@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 01 02:30:29 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PCjEC-0002aT-BL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 02:30:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34774 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PCjEB-0001uo-Ei for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:30:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57200 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PCj4Q-0000EM-62 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:20:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PCixZ-0001wn-2S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:13:25 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59512) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PCixY-0001wj-Rn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:13:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PCid0-0005WC-HA; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:52:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7296 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7296-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7296.128857271721206 (code B ref 7296); Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2010 00:51:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PCicu-0005Vz-OD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:51:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp ([133.82.132.2]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PCicr-0005Vu-FD for 7296@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:51:55 -0400 Original-Received: from church.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (church [133.82.132.36]) by mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8436AC0566; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 09:56:08 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?UTF-8?Q?Shij=C5=8D?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:52:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41318 Archived-At: >>>>> On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 01:24:55 +0100, Lennart Borgman said: > Could we, as a first step, do as Eli suggested, i.e. let > display-pixel-height/width return the working area size instead of > the total display size? Is there any reason not to do this now? I'd rather suggest implementing "some of window manager emulations" (i.e., shortening width/height if specified one exceeds available one, and possibly maximized, fullwidth, and fullheight for the fullscreen frame parameter) on W32 and seeing if the proposed function is still necessary, before introducing incompatibility or new primitives. YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp