From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r110582: Fix wording of error message in staticpro. Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:35:37 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5080564C.5090309@dancol.org> <3slif3qzvf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83ipa71p3j.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1350596150 3712 80.91.229.3 (18 Oct 2012 21:35:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 21:35:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 18 23:35:58 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TOxkx-0004bS-QJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 23:35:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60870 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOxkq-0004Ga-G0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:35:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60649) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOxkm-0004C9-TB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:35:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOxki-0006eg-Fx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:35:44 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:35185) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOxki-0006eK-2X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:35:40 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOxkf-0007oU-K3; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:35:38 -0400 X-Spook: Albright Croatian Bin Laden Firewalls SHA Islam X-Ran: ,KK.VnayA4iHY|sHxDP|re5h(!xCY+oLF0A|xjCeP<0{!6ZZRuu*V~GDKB?DF0=!Scj;a; X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154427 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> IMO, the second clause should be absent altogether, or say "please make >> a bug report". As with puresize, this is not something users should be >> changing. > > As long as we are bykeshedding, how about > > NSTATICS should be enlarged. I don't think I'm bikeshedding, I'm trying to discourage people from thinking that these parts are intended to be user-serviceable. This kind of thing http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2012-10/msg00253.html Now that I have set extra pure size to an obscene amount I will never see the warning anymore. is bad (IMO).