From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7761: The NS port is still 11 times slower than normal Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:05:49 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4D1C6ED9.6030600@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310238389 22869 80.91.229.12 (9 Jul 2011 19:06:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 19:06:29 +0000 (UTC) To: 7761-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 09 21:06:25 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfcr9-0002Uv-5g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:06:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35519 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfcr8-0008TD-7P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:06:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41238) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfcqq-0008Sl-3H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:06:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfcqo-0001xV-Sz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:06:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58494) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfcqo-0001xL-DD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfcqo-0001OO-DW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:06:02 -0400 Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 19:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 7761 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,ns X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Mail-Followup-To: 7761@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 7761-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D7761.13102383575336 (code D ref 7761); Sat, 09 Jul 2011 19:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7761-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2011 19:05:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfcqi-0001O1-58 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:05:56 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfcqg-0001Np-SI for 7761-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:05:55 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50712) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfcqb-0007ZH-HH; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:05:49 -0400 X-Spook: gamma Capricorn CESID Plame Treasury analyzer Iran Cocaine X-Ran: ,)WU=[DZl"qb/JF%BDp=zm3b*?Hy\*oU;,s:B0OTVUtVsUmu%6LgWBh`i?d1T=pL7l3PLq X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Fri, 31 Dec 2010 10:26:40 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:06:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48362 Archived-At: I don't see a need to keep open this particular report, which was marked "wontfix" some time ago. This is a very general report. It is better to focus on specific issues in separate reports and try and fix them (for example, #2056).