From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Moreton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34516: Multi-monitor frame sets Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 15:00:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87bm3a74s4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83pnrpjb44.fsf@gnu.org> <8736okvlv2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86sgwkawnx.fsf@gmail.com> <87imxfv519.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <865ztf73x0.fsf@gmail.com> <87ftsip36g.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87h8cuw7s6.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5C72596F.9010707@gmx.at> <86zhqkq1h5.fsf@gmail.com> <5C73BFDB.9020703@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="240919"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.92 (windows-nt) To: 34516@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 25 16:02:40 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gyHmB-0010Uk-T1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:02:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38748 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyHmA-0000Tw-Sb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 10:02:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:32789) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyHlm-0000Lq-7F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 10:02:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyHlg-0002Fl-C2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 10:02:14 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38098) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyHla-0002DA-Tc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 10:02:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gyHla-0004Vs-IW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 10:02:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87bm3a74s4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Resent-From: Andy Moreton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 15:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34516 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.155110688217300 (code B ref -1); Mon, 25 Feb 2019 15:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2019 15:01:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51642 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gyHkv-0004Ux-S0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 10:01:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46367) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gyHku-0004Uk-0F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 10:01:20 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:42027) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyHkn-0001Kl-MQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 10:01:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60733) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyHke-0008EE-2o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 10:01:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyHkU-00012P-FV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 10:01:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=47858 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyHkU-00011m-83 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 10:00:54 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gyHkS-000y9q-U7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:00:52 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:vv52V9xcFnsBu7nnIRuU9xUumAI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155768 Archived-At: On Mon 25 Feb 2019, martin rudalics wrote: >> Please explain what you mean here with an example, as what you have >> written makes no sense. > > Since I don't use multiple monitors it might not make sense indeed. > AFAIK usually only the primary monitor shows a taskbar, dock, or > panel. Whether these can be shown on or moved to secondary monitors > is system dependent. Hence IMO showing a frame on a secondary monitor > should pessimistically assume that a non-workarea object can appear > there even if 'display-monitor-attributes-list' says otherwise. If > you are sure that this may not happen, just disregard what I said. The workarea should always be the same size or smaller than the geometry on each monitor, and this information (while system dependent) should always be accurate when display-monitor-attributes-list is called. However, it is entirely possible that the user reconfigures the taskbar, dock panel etc. between a call to display-monitor-attributes-list and using the information it returns. AndyM