From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Moreton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15834: Crash during bootstrap Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:08:09 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83wqki53hh.fsf@gnu.org> <82y54wigx3.fsf@gmail.com> <83zjpc2jz8.fsf@gnu.org> <82txfj7tao.fsf@gmail.com> <83mwlb38ch.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384176630 10743 80.91.229.3 (11 Nov 2013 13:30:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:30:30 +0000 (UTC) To: 15834@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 11 14:30:33 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VfrZT-0001Jg-QI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:30:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37229 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfrZT-0001qu-CP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:30:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44173) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfrZH-0001nb-Hr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:30:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfrZ8-0004wm-3v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:30:15 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60907) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfrZ8-0004wc-0K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:30:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VfrZ6-0007JH-C2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:30:05 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Andy Moreton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:30:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15834 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.138417654727963 (code B ref -1); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:30:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2013 13:29:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46668 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VfrYA-0007Gt-Fo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:29:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41711) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VfrY1-0007Fy-Hi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:28:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfrXn-0003zX-0I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:28:52 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:57255) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfrXm-0003zL-Jh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:28:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43297) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfrXf-000108-3T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:28:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfrXX-0003ud-On for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:28:35 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:33226) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfrEH-0005Ka-ST for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:08:34 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VfrE8-0006dw-HV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:08:24 +0100 Original-Received: from uk.solarflare.com ([193.34.186.16]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:08:24 +0100 Original-Received: from andrewjmoreton by uk.solarflare.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:08:24 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 27 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: uk.solarflare.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:gCcN/b/fg+f9UroW237dGR0A2Xc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80261 Archived-At: On Mon 11 Nov 2013, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Andy Moreton >> Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 23:04:15 +0000 >> >> I found r115053 crashed compiling tramp-smb.el when bootstrapping from a >> clean tree with -O2, but not with -O0. Recompiling tramp-smb.el from the >> built emacs also did not have any problems in either case. > > What if you copy the initial bootstrap-emacs.exe while it is > compiling, and try compiling tramp-smb with that afterwards, does it > crash? I tried running bootstrap-emacs.exe with a batch compile on the command line without problems. >> I think it is unlikely that that cache-long-scans is involved. It is >> more likely to be some interaction between my build script, and recent >> changes to path handling in the makefiles and configury. > > Yes, maybe the special way you invoke MSYS triggers something. Try > removing unneeded things from the shell environment, perhaps. After switching to using a non-interactive login msys shell, I can't reproduce this on one of the machines, so I think this problem is probably pilot error and and can be closed.