From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Moreton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Calc and bignums Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 13:32:47 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="190416"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (windows-nt) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 26 14:33:42 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hg77M-000nR2-P0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:33:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39746 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hg77L-0005UP-O5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 08:33:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54607) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hg76n-0005UA-8X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 08:33:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hg76l-00056K-97 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 08:33:05 -0400 Original-Received: from 195-159-176-226.customer.powertech.no ([195.159.176.226]:45158 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hg76h-0004s2-Dn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 08:33:01 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hg76c-000mUj-Ew for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:32:54 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:SQDYFKtd8yj6TDeiF0Co6GiKC1k= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:238155 Archived-At: On Tue 25 Jun 2019, Stefan Monnier wrote: > I just pushed a patch to Calc which removes its homegrown > bignums, making it use "native" bignums instead. > > I never really use Calc, so the testing was rather limited. > Knowing myself, I probably messed up at a few places. If you were not able to test it properly, why did you push this change ? At the least you could have written some test cases to show that patch does not introduce obvious regressions. Why the rush ? AndyM