From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Moreton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building Emacs from a new MinGW environment Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:46:44 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83k3ijfhk0.fsf@gnu.org> <83hadnf7gs.fsf@gnu.org> <83hadmqvql.fsf@gnu.org> <83txhkpszv.fsf@gnu.org> <83pps8pnc9.fsf@gnu.org> <83ob7splia.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3ifq5o5.fsf@gnu.org> <83d2o7q28r.fsf@gnu.org> <8338p3pded.fsf@gnu.org> <83r4cmo9m2.fsf@gnu.org> <83pps6o3f2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1379501235 1209 80.91.229.3 (18 Sep 2013 10:47:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 10:47:15 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 18 12:47:18 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VMFHv-0002Fh-JB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 12:47:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45871 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VMFHv-00071X-6f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 06:47:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55139) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VMFHm-00071L-Ks for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 06:47:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VMFHg-0000EN-RD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 06:47:06 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60022) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VMFHg-0000E9-Kw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 06:47:00 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VMFHf-0001ah-9Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 12:46:59 +0200 Original-Received: from uk.solarflare.com ([193.34.186.16]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 12:46:59 +0200 Original-Received: from andrewjmoreton by uk.solarflare.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 12:46:59 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 31 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: uk.solarflare.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:b/+dEfbVAg3iBlsKt3a5ud5UIV8= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:163425 Archived-At: On Wed 18 Sep 2013, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:32:09 +0200 >> From: Dani Moncayo >> Cc: Emacs development discussions >> >> test "$MSYSTEM" = "MINGW32" && srcdir=`(cd "$srcdir"; pwd -W | sed >> -e 's,^\([[A-Za-z]]\):,/\1,')` >> >> With that change, now the only problems remaining are the crashes I >> get much later in the bootstraping, when Emacs compiles certain Elisp >> files. > > Do the same crashes happen if you build Emacs outside of the MSYS > tree? I have an unchanged mingw toochain I have beeen using successfully for months, and I also see a crash during bootstrap. >From my build log for bootstrap of r114374, it crashed while compiling lisp/cedet/semantic/db-ebrowse.el. Attaching gdb and issuing 'thread apply all bt' did not obtain a backtrace: (gdb) The program being debugged exited while in a function called from GDB. Evaluation of the expression containing the function (backtrace_top) will be abandoned. The rest of the build continued to completion. This seems to be repeatable. Anything I can do to help diagnose it ? AndyM