From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:53:50 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4EB25C0C.3060806@gmx.at> <834nylm3c3.fsf@gnu.org> <8339e4na27.fsf@gnu.org> <83ty6kl09e.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1320425677 5213 80.91.229.12 (4 Nov 2011 16:54:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 16:54:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9943@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 04 17:54:32 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMN2G-0004JF-3u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:54:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37250 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMN2F-0003I0-OX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:54:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35507) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMN2C-0003Hv-Ju for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:54:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMN2B-0004YC-KI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:54:28 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56010) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMN2B-0004Y3-Id for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:54:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMN4g-0007kj-FU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9943 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 9943-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9943.132042579329763 (code B ref 9943); Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9943) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2011 16:56:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMN4C-0007k0-Mo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:56:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMN4A-0007jr-Kl for 9943@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:56:31 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMN1b-00055v-7r; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:53:51 -0400 X-Spook: Guantanamo Mena UNSCOM SEAL Team 6 Nazi Waco, Texas X-Ran: Pz"=/%@Q-%=P"ymGrvyxm6l_y7@kDOnQ:W\>NY;5|L2^~g&PbUXiGB\v#v[jdIk+#mSa{] X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <83ty6kl09e.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:12:13 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:57:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53518 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> All this code duplication is really a bore. We should really create >> a new file (say "dispfns.c") where we can consolidate common code from >> xfns, nsfns, and w32fns. > > I agree. How about filing a wishlist bug for that? I think http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=4402#36 covers it.