From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16959: 24.3.50; defadvice docstring out of date Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:16:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5319DEF8.3050809@miszellen.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1394475443 2936 80.91.229.3 (10 Mar 2014 18:17:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 18:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16959@debbugs.gnu.org To: Florian Beck Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 10 19:17:31 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WN4lP-00056J-8k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:17:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50474 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WN4lO-0000qg-RH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:17:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45058) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WN4l8-0000WM-GF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:17:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WN4l4-00033k-I1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:17:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59361) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WN4l4-00033f-Ff for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WN4l3-0005o7-RP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 18:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16959 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16959-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16959.139447537922240 (code B ref 16959); Mon, 10 Mar 2014 18:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16959) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2014 18:16:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60543 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WN4kM-0005me-Gy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:16:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:36315) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WN4kK-0005mU-AS for 16959@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:16:16 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WN4kJ-0007gX-5F; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:16:15 -0400 X-Spook: warfare AMW Hugo Chavez South Africa Ermes AMEMB KGB CBNRC X-Ran: jHxY-Ox!!1C1YO}[):,rVwp.A@3FL(c4gnA,&H|gt$Yu>P`n2=AJL>Ih.G6l;V!E%d+k#" X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <5319DEF8.3050809@miszellen.de> (Florian Beck's message of "Fri, 07 Mar 2014 16:00:08 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86720 Archived-At: Florian Beck wrote: > The docstring of defadvice says > > See Info node `(elisp)Advising Functions' for comprehensive documentation. > > This is no longer true. OK; removed. > Also, while the old advice mechanism seems to have been be obsoleted, > the help doesn't say so. Why do you think it is obsolete? > BTW, the nadvice info could use some more examples and a note on how > to transition from defadvice. I'll leave this report open till someone does that.