From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matthieu Moy Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Bazaar repository Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:24:42 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87skyvse7k.fsf@xmission.com> <86ejae96t4.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205504828 15884 80.91.229.12 (14 Mar 2008 14:27:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bazaar@lists.canonical.com, Eli Zaretskii , dak@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Fri Mar 14 15:27:35 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from chlorine.canonical.com ([91.189.94.204]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JaAsJ-0004CK-CX for gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:27:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JaArg-0007X2-UW; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:26:33 +0000 Original-Received: from imag.imag.fr ([129.88.30.1]) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JaArc-0007Wu-KY for bazaar@lists.canonical.com; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:26:28 +0000 Original-Received: from mail-veri.imag.fr (mail-veri.imag.fr [129.88.43.52]) by imag.imag.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2EEOhxm005037 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:24:43 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from bauges.imag.fr ([129.88.43.5]) by mail-veri.imag.fr with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1JaApu-0001xl-PE; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:24:42 +0100 Original-Received: from moy by bauges.imag.fr with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JaApu-0001qX-Mu; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:24:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Fri\, 14 Mar 2008 14\:03\:35 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:24:44 +0100 (CET) X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact MI2S MIM for more information X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IMAG-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-IMAG-MailScanner-From: moy@imag.fr X-BeenThere: bazaar@lists.canonical.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: bazaar discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Errors-To: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general:38575 gmane.emacs.devel:92556 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > Yes, "diff" is quite important as well. Unfortunately, bzr diff seems > to have the same performance problem. It shouldn't be on a "normal" setup at least with a recent enough bzr. Git is obviously faster, but for example, on an emacs tree, "bzr diff" takes 0.3 seconds, while Git takes 0.05. So, the time taken by bzr is acceptable to me.