From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16522: 24.3.50; Regression: GLib-GObject warnings on stderr Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:16:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: <52E2BC09.10800@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413051437 5593 80.91.229.3 (11 Oct 2014 18:17:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 18:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Eggert To: 16522@debbugs.gnu.org, Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 11 20:17:08 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xd1E4-0002PG-Kl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 20:17:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54936 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xd1E4-0001iL-05 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:17:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36400) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xd1E0-0001iG-QU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:17:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xd1Dy-0007Qs-Dg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:17:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49712) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xd1Dy-0007Qo-Az for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xd1Dx-00035U-Mm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:17:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 18:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16522 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16522-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16522.141305136611786 (code B ref 16522); Sat, 11 Oct 2014 18:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16522) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Oct 2014 18:16:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41276 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xd1D3-000341-VS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:16:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:51472) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xd1D0-00033t-U6 for 16522@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:16:03 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xd1Cz-0004GG-GC; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:16:01 -0400 X-Spook: undercover spy AGT. AMME S Key Armani keyhole satellite X-Ran: GIkrBze[drm"_r\kd~>8PqD9??=HKzj-{!~zKf;x,gYEL.)fG@!v)<]}O3v/x[W(+EcWz0 X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <52E2BC09.10800@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Fri, 24 Jan 2014 11:16:25 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:94424 Paul Eggert wrote: > GtkMenuItem's "label" property was introduced in GTK+ 2.16, according > to . You're using > GTK+ 2.10.4, which could explain the problem. I'm using Firefox 20 > which has GTK+ 3.10.6 and do not see the problem. > > I suspect that the attached patch (which is trunk bzr 115967.1.1) is > what introduced the problem. If you back this change out, does it fix > things? I'll CC: this to Daniel Colascione to give him a heads-up. Any comment on this issue?