From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20298: Missing public key for 24.5 Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:14:36 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429902923 3744 80.91.229.3 (24 Apr 2015 19:15:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 19:15:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20298@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mehmet Atif Ergun Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 24 21:15:09 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ylj49-0001Hr-6b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:15:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46097 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ylj48-0001eM-6j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:15:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33016) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ylj44-0001dD-Ob for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:15:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ylj44-0001AS-0R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:15:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49200) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ylj43-0001A9-Se for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ylj43-0002W3-Do for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:15:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 19:15:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20298 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20298-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20298.14299028799594 (code B ref 20298); Fri, 24 Apr 2015 19:15:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20298) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2015 19:14:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38976 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ylj3e-0002Ug-RZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:14:39 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:53115 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ylj3d-0002UZ-81 for 20298@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:14:37 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ylj3c-0000SX-Mp; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:14:36 -0400 X-Spook: AIMSX JSOFC3IP FTS2000 wire transfer Nazi SDI tempest X-Ran: "*"4v0.$\|ic8?I6`CsWZJcM/5!'};.rnQnPo2Hs+O!DzG/wRbRj.u[.qp3qr9T!ZIuO0Z X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:102000 Archived-At: Mehmet Atif Ergun wrote: > I tried to verify the new (emacs-24.5) release but the public key that > signed the file is missing in the gnu keyring. The 24.4 had the same > problem (the signature for 24.4 belonged to a @gnu.org address. Nobody here can do anything about that, it's a GNU sysadmin issue. If you want to verify the signatures, both keys are available from standard keyservers, eg pgp.mit.edu. Though since you have never met either of us, you have no idea how trustworthy we are. :) (I don't see what the value of a keyring that is stored on the same ftp server as the file you want to download is. Especially since the process for updating it, which should be automatic, seems to break a lot.)