From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#365: rmail mode Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 22:26:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200806051228.m55CSEDp016527@ru.neurosim.downstate.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310264857 16491 80.91.229.12 (10 Jul 2011 02:27:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 02:27:37 +0000 (UTC) To: 365-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 10 04:27:33 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfjk4-0001c6-Uq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 04:27:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33010 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfjk4-00077B-45 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 22:27:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44373) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfjjd-00074D-KU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 22:27:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfjja-0001im-Of for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 22:27:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36248) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfjja-0001ic-N4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 22:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfjja-0003Xv-Ki for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 22:27:02 -0400 Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 02:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 365 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo unreproducible Mail-Followup-To: 365@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 365-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D365.131026476813541 (code D ref 365); Sun, 10 Jul 2011 02:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 365-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jul 2011 02:26:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfjih-0003WM-7l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 22:26:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfjig-0003Vi-45 for 365-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 22:26:06 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42708) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfjia-00083l-Ie; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 22:26:00 -0400 X-Spook: Geraldton Legion of Doom digicash STARLAN Abu Ghraib X-Ran: B/r"hi, (Bill Lytton's message of "Thu, 5 Jun 2008 08:28:14 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 22:27:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48438 Archived-At: Sorry, this is all too vague for us to do anything about it. If you still see the problem in the latest release, 23.3, please reply giving a complete description and recipe starting from emacs -Q, and the report can be re-opened if needed. Bill Lytton wrote: > ignore prior bug report since I may not have traced the problem > correctly > > the real problem is that if I read an rmail buffer that I have > previously read, it is marked buffer modified