From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Adam Funk Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Why can't I use xargs emacs? Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:21:19 +0000 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1265208128 4419 80.91.229.12 (3 Feb 2010 14:42:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:42:08 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 03 15:42:06 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NcgQV-0002RF-KE for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:41:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35895 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcgQV-0001Lx-5V for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:41:55 -0500 Original-Path: news.stanford.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Trace: individual.net KHub/+5Sgew8yxExiCvI4QrHXjdZm/yxd7oYlui/mARFNQMznP X-Orig-Path: news.ducksburg.com!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:cd4LosDo+kjZe50HC3G4nHbeOh4= sha1:bXXaRVWsYJiW61xhBMMXN7XjCNk= User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.0-16/mm/ao (Ubuntu Intrepid) Original-Xref: news.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:176579 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:71648 Archived-At: On 2010-02-03, Thierry Volpiatto wrote: > Why not a simple: > > emacs -nw -Q $(find . -name '*.txt') That works, thanks. I'd forgotten about the $(...) construction. > Why do you want to use xargs? Because that's what I always do (except for this, now) when I want to find or grep -l some files and fire a command at them all.