Re: Replacement for C-x 8 based on input methods

[Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann)]

Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> writes:

> (sorry if these seem like nit-picking!)

No, you're right about all of them.  I changed the implementation
accordingly.

Now we need the right input method.

My current plan is to take latin-1-prefix and latin-1-postfix and the
current C-x 8 keymap and to construct the union of all the sequences
found there.  (What should I do in case of a conflict?  Prefer the
input methods because these are the new standard?  Or prefer the C-x
8 keymap because that preserves backward compatibility?)

kai
-- 
Silence is foo!