From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10688: The default mode for Perl should be cperl-mode instead of perl-mode Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:41:23 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8762fmbmwn.fsf@lifelogs.com> <1351159277417-268030.post@n5.nabble.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1351194124 19627 80.91.229.3 (25 Oct 2012 19:42:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10688@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 25 21:42:12 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TRTJj-0007ak-GA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:42:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58378 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRTJZ-0005tU-Ii for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:42:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47519) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRTJW-0005tD-Ft for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:41:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRTJV-0003Nj-IV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:41:58 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51671) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRTJV-0003Nf-FO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:41:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRTLW-0006Ok-4X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10688 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10688-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10688.135119421224544 (code B ref 10688); Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10688) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Oct 2012 19:43:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33689 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRTL1-0006Np-Jm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:43:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:54796) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRTKz-0006Nh-BR for 10688@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:43:30 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRTIx-0007sA-H6; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:41:23 -0400 X-Spook: COSCO strategic 2600 Magazine Cocaine analyzer PGP Merlin X-Ran: xA8wf~*c`@3:?A3_5wvQN*'C%O'osH*-@oYq_TCNZ^f'aaX*s0; X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:25:32 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:66053 Archived-At: Is cperl-mode.el in Emacs still not to be modified? If someone reports a bug in cperl-mode can it be fixed without deferring to upstream? (I have no interest in modifying it, but in the past you've basically said not to change it, IIUC.)