From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: nnfolder and large-file-warning-threshold Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 20:37:13 +0200 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87oekxg1fl.fsf@koldfront.dk> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1094670235 23789 80.91.224.253 (8 Sep 2004 19:03:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 19:03:55 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M6952@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Sep 08 21:03:47 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C57KL-00056P-00 for ; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 20:37:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1C57KD-0003Qq-00; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 13:37:45 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1C57K8-0003Q4-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 13:37:40 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1C57K8-00012d-Bd for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 13:37:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-new.rz.uni-ulm.de (mail-new.rz.uni-ulm.de [134.60.1.1]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC1D3A0039 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 13:37:38 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from lumberjack.physik.uni-ulm.de (lumberjack.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.10.173]) by mail.uni-ulm.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i88IbDb1008845; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 20:37:13 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: by lumberjack.physik.uni-ulm.de (Postfix, from userid 170) id 3E20A18165; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 20:37:13 +0200 (CEST) Mail-Followup-To: , Original-To: , X-Face: .*T0'iU(sujq_j9\J>-d4fg;N/1++U#U$_5ii6k.=|"-n'?5O:Hyz&wi'-!I~,}7~GgT=0S /&-R5sbkNy5+Xo1y{Tw2KKxi@Xh"g@]Qc|.U<*]WDd)qvGowFDvfU1F]{EDho:7P0@|oOD=Bc{K4?> WP68K[Mx:}=`ZT'6g4'f+g?;`vri2!)xGy}3:=l'(/Cea0l4lo^H5#@/Z3ev In-Reply-To: <87oekxg1fl.fsf@koldfront.dk> (Adam =?iso-8859-1?q?Sj=F8gren's?= message of "Thu, 26 Aug 2004 21:10:54 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-RollaNet-Metrics: gemini 1004; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:58409 gmane.emacs.devel:26899 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26899 On Thu, Aug 26 2004, Adam Sj=F8gren wrote: > On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 20:52:20 +0200, Reiner wrote: > >> Should we bind `large-file-warning-threshold' to a larger value (or >> nil) in the relevant Gnus functions[2] or would it be better to >> increase the default value of `large-file-warning-threshold'? > > How about defaulting to nnml: instead of nnfolder: for the archive? > Any reason not to? This won't be a remedy for people using large nnfolder archives/groups. But I certainly would object to such a change. I don't know if it can be done in a backward compatible way. Bye, Reiner. --=20 ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/