From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: merge emacs-pretest-bug and emacs-devel Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:12:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <14wsw1bfmq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187025376 32746 80.91.229.12 (13 Aug 2007 17:16:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:16:16 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 13 19:16:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IKdWV-0001mF-Vz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:16:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IKdWV-0008A5-E9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:16:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IKdU2-00077v-0p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:13:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IKdU0-00077V-Hp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:13:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IKdU0-00077R-9u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:13:36 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IKdTz-00070N-VM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:13:36 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IKdTn-0006VS-Og for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:13:23 +0200 Original-Received: from p54a9770f.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.169.119.15]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:13:23 +0200 Original-Received: from Reiner.Steib by p54a9770f.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:13:23 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p54a9770f.dip.t-dialin.net X-Face: #vK]N[`vqjuod*|)'[iD7/"3AB-ApT%fmN"LWAg@oS7OesGv~)n[OBTLM#I="J'Y^-7I I/ps7o_'IK@#-Rs{::DZ@O8yS|fexe,XslY[:dNWOb~>?mC-&i_c)say:"\IpA.5U.b]'NY; Pks{lb h.+#6%DpZuaK3dcHB`Av3zc:r!C%~s0&m, tWj]&}, qg.+0ww2gK%f!:GK|wMl.I!(voY*1"^li8"~B BNG)9LvPi?^DMR-GVDnZqhu*3Hi, +g=wFhI)BL6&u{EOVEHjVEVq~d?_}lMntWAc3(6?kftjc>_f>! g0wM(qPM$d5]^TT_Qyi&L?LGVG)SHN;Gk/,pkY9,~ Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:P9GJzfvOQysWCdUVU16DV1wsr4U= X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76467 Archived-At: On Sun, Aug 12 2007, Glenn Morris wrote: > I don't know if it's worth adding a [Bug] tag to messages that are > forwarded in this way? > > Leaving M-x report-emacs-bug alone will make it easier to change back > in the future, if needed. `TeX-submit-bug-report' (AUCTeX) and `report-emacs-bug' in XEmacs add the version number to the subject: | 11.84; Some AUCTeX bug | [Bug: 21.5-b27] Some XEmacs bug This might be useful for Emacs as well (for 22.2+) because it immediately shows the version / branch information (I'm not sure if the trunk, unicode and multi-tty have different version numbers at present; probably they should.). IIRC, we use "nn.mm;" instead of "[nn.mm]" because the later might get stripped by mailing software (stripping list identifiers). I agree that we should keep the different mail addresses in `report-emacs-bug'. Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/