From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: duplicate input methods: german-postfix and german-alt-postfix Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:52:57 +0100 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1197323673 22518 80.91.229.12 (10 Dec 2007 21:54:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Mathias Dahl , Kenichi Handa , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 10 22:54:41 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J1qaF-0002Nl-KA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:54:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1qZy-0003dT-2c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:54:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J1qZu-0003cp-VG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:54:19 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J1qZr-0003a6-6O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:54:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1qZr-0003a3-0p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:54:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.uni-ulm.de ([134.60.1.11]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J1qZq-0001nW-Ue for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:54:15 -0500 Original-Received: from bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.41.37]) by mail.uni-ulm.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id lBALs7E9019005; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:54:08 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from localhost (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.41.37]) by bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B805512CBD; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:54:07 +0100 (CET) X-Face: 'bg&jY[8V'W&:=~6w"|>}#4/T; w~36ei4NNMyKRR.a$n=$|sWFPF1y]a\>6kc\*#GN]UDM| Ywv, vbL^XF1nIp\:F=$Ei2o&mEe:%N~, :3]vtQ~s9u$9izmX$IF@VgGl7/, ^dbuM<3|AO2}.%|%?kZ 2Y=@\U!~cll^=8Z9ihKq%wmUe1Ky(#kl3T'>Qk0Ia3mCBsTk?E(,X In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:12:07 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-INFN-TO-Metrics: poseidon 1233; Body=4 Fuz1=4 Fuz2=4 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail.uni-ulm.de id lBALs7E9019005 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:84979 Archived-At: On Mon, Dec 10 2007, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Kenichi Handa writes: >> Reiner Steib writes: >>> BTW, my impression is that `latin-alt.el' was derived from >>> `latin-post.el' and modifications to most languages (input methods) >>> were changed, but german wasn't. Is this historically correct? Just >>> curious... >> >> I've found many other input methods (e.g. danish-postfix vs >> danish-alt-postfix) are the same. [Also `swedish-alt-postfix' and `swedish-postfix' as pointed out by Mathi= as.] > None of these input methods use the problematic characters as postfix. Why is =BB"=AB more problematic than other postfix characters (e.g. =BB'=AB= )? Bye, Reiner. --=20 ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/