From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [Patch] Make tls.el support certificate verification Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:38:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: <877imqtdhb.fsf@denkblock.local> <87zlzc35bh.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <87ps063ixd.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <87zlxo4lwr.fsf@denkblock.local> <87d4uaksur.fsf@denkblock.local> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195252799 23289 80.91.229.12 (16 Nov 2007 22:39:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Elias Oltmanns Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 16 23:40:03 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1It9r0-0002oH-Jq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:40:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1It9qn-0004nF-L6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:39:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1It9qk-0004lQ-5s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:39:46 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1It9qg-0004fh-Fl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:39:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1It9qg-0004fV-CY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:39:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.uni-ulm.de ([134.60.1.11]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1It9qf-0004Rc-S3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:39:42 -0500 Original-Received: from bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.41.37]) by mail.uni-ulm.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAGMdbsV027382; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:39:37 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from localhost (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.41.37]) by bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC4A12CBB; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:39:37 +0100 (CET) X-Face: :6KQZ[nyoS_edmB.%gw-=)BYth^|2+Y+^cu%I$FSx!&>-'om>3H7A|M&n(V7fIo3P.; yo.b yq4$p; ZaBtkv)\}biaiBQe"mD}iib1AA@99-fZ7i*bLhNRVC&0Wkxg9)SH?oWc@{ Mail-Followup-To: Elias Oltmanns , emacs-devel@gnu.org, ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <87d4uaksur.fsf@denkblock.local> (Elias Oltmanns's message of "Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:22:52 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-HP_X86_64_8CPU-Metrics: poseidon 1245; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83386 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:65705 Archived-At: On Fri, Nov 16 2007, Elias Oltmanns wrote: > Well, I sent ChangeLog entries a week ago (see [1] and [2]) but nothing > has shown up in cvs yet. Sorry for the delay, I didn't have a change do commit your changes during the past week (I'm not at home and I don't have a reasonable internet connection at the moment). > BTW: It has happened several times in the past that messages I sent to > the ding list went (seemingly) unnoticed. I have read your messages. For tls.el, I hoped that Simon or someone else can comment as I'm not familiar with it. Similar for your agent related patches (I don't even use the agent). > This is particularly annoying if the message actually contains a > ready made patch to fix a bug and all I'm asking for is to review > the patch and tell me what's wrong with it so it can be committed > eventually. If you don't get responses, please feel free to remind us about the issue. (Before your papers had been arrived, we couldn't install your patches.) > Curiously enough, the message I finally got a response to (the one > that started this thread) was about adding a new feature rather than > fixing a bug in existing code. It also strikes me that this message > went to both, the ding list as well as emacs-devel. I don't think there is a strong correlation. > This makes me wonder whether I should generally send patches to the > emacs-devel list rather than the ding list even if they concern the > gnus trunk. Now that the Gnus trunk is also in Emacs trunk you may send it emacs-devel in this case as well. But please keep ding copied too. > Or should I just Cc one of the Gnus developers instead? In that > case, is there a source where I can see who is maintaining which > part of Gnus? You may Cc the maintainer listed in the file. Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/