From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:15:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146244602 5182 80.91.229.2 (28 Apr 2006 17:16:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 17:16:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 28 19:16:40 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZWa5-00073A-Af for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:16:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZWa4-0005BH-Lu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:16:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FZWZY-0004yb-A5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:16:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FZWZW-0004xp-P4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:16:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZWZW-0004xl-IK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [134.60.1.1] (helo=mail.uni-ulm.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FZWcd-0007nl-Un; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:19:16 -0400 Original-Received: from bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.10.123]) by mail.uni-ulm.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3SHFrr3011641; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:15:54 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: by bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (Postfix, from userid 170) id C0E59117E5; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:15:53 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii X-Face: .*T0'iU(sujq_j9\J>-d4fg; N/1++U#U$_5ii6k.=|"-n'?5O:Hyz&wi'-!I~,}7~GgT=0S /&-R5sbkNy5+Xo1y{Tw2KKxi@Xh"g@]Qc|.U<*]WDd)qvGowFDvfU1F]{EDho:7P0@|oOD=Bc{K4?> WP68K[Mx:}=`ZT'6g4'f+g?;`vri2!)xGy}3:=l'(/Cea0l4lo^H5#@/Z3ev Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:19:59 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110005 (No Gnus v0.5) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-EATSERVER-Metrics: gemini 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53565 Archived-At: On Fri, Apr 28 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I think it's time to see whether the *.elc files we use are identical. > Can you upload a couple of worst offenders, say, files.elc and > simple.elc? I'd like to compare them to mine. http://theotp1.physik.uni-ulm.de/~ste/tmp/emacs/lisp/ (The *.elc files were compile on i686.) Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/