From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: bad tool-bar icons in Emacs 22.1 release Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 18:26:45 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181406503 19492 80.91.229.12 (9 Jun 2007 16:28:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 16:28:23 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 09 18:28:21 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hx3nY-0003fJ-6z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 18:28:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hx3nX-0000HH-PV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 12:28:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hx3nA-0008Tp-UA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 12:27:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hx3n9-0008Sh-5o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 12:27:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hx3n8-0008SY-Ue for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 12:27:55 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hx3n8-0000Rp-Ff for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 12:27:54 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hx3mX-0004M2-VA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 18:27:17 +0200 Original-Received: from bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de ([134.60.10.123]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 18:27:17 +0200 Original-Received: from Reiner.Steib by bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 18:27:17 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 33 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de X-Face: /U7=m^"/-Dn61mAl{g9e3>\G5Tp,oEX|V)g2I1hBk\ML; )7A?6cmB-y7y?'NA^J<=oz7syB =(McAwIHgLX!.B?R3X}98d@?>CrT094KLWh]WU4gDpnL/")MS(XoQTv`Oq225uL>+; CpPXo$N5e>N> $tPd-gbB^F{gQS#1ase]XO~D4p4M"3+F-7~u]dy3I?Pb8RO*H-EFeWDUf?Rf, d]pv\Jvh2Cht!A=im yKAS2Z%Ao^;}W/qzMvMm Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:nTu3rvoeGBuH5vz7AlFMe4LZaEw= X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:15803 Archived-At: On Sat, Jun 09 2007, Drew Adams wrote: >> I'm not sure if this is what your asking for, but for nicer icons, you >> need to install some image DLLs (see the README below). > > No, I wasn't looking for nicer icons (but thanks anyway). > I was reporting a bug in the Emacs 22.1 release (with the default icons). The nicer color icons (GNOME/GTK/style; see e.g. etc/images/save.xpm) are "the default icons" [1]. They only require external image libraries whereas the monochrome PBM/PGM/PPM icons are supported by natively by the Emacs binary w/o further libs (DLLs on Windows), see the README file cited previously. [1] I'd consider the monochrome icons as a fallback e.g. for monochrome displays. >> Looks like a bug. But I couldn't reproduce this when using >> emacs-22.1-bin-i386.zip without further DLLs. > > Did you do just what I did? I downloaded and installed first the full > Windows binary distrib (i.e. bin, not barebin), and then downloaded and > installed the full source distrib, on top of the Windows binary distrib. See > my description for details. No, I downloaded and unzipped emacs-22.1-bin-i386.zip. But I doubt that it makes a difference WRT the misaligned icons. Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/