front-sticky and rear-sticky not mentioned

front-sticky and rear-sticky not mentioned

[Lennart Borgman]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 110 bytes --]

Those properties are not mentioned on

  (info "(elisp) Special Properties")

Shouldn't they be listed there?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 142 bytes --]

Re: front-sticky and rear-sticky not mentioned

[David Kastrup]

Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> writes:

> Those properties are not mentioned on
>
>   (info "(elisp) Special Properties")
>
> Shouldn't they be listed there?

32.19.4 Properties with Special Meanings
----------------------------------------

Here is a table of text property names that have special built-in
meanings.  The following sections list a few additional special property
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
names that control filling and property inheritance.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


-- 
David Kastrup

Re: front-sticky and rear-sticky not mentioned

[Lennart Borgman]

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:57 AM, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
> Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Those properties are not mentioned on
>>
>>   (info "(elisp) Special Properties")
>>
>> Shouldn't they be listed there?
>
> 32.19.4 Properties with Special Meanings
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Here is a table of text property names that have special built-in
> meanings.  The following sections list a few additional special property
>           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> names that control filling and property inheritance.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Thanks, I see. Maybe it is only me, but I think it is quite easy to
miss it. I have looked at the table long ago and "knew" what it was
supposed to contain.

I think it would be good if all special properties where listed in the
table (that is kind of the purpose of it) and that those additional
special properties that are not explained there had links to where
they are explained.