From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: front-sticky and rear-sticky not mentioned Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 11:32:21 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87k4slj9mg.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270546383 12102 80.91.229.12 (6 Apr 2010 09:33:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 06 11:32:58 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nz59U-000268-2X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:32:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38611 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nz59T-0004WX-6i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:32:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nz59M-0004WS-DR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:32:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52142 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nz59J-0004WK-VV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:32:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nz59G-0008E2-CU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:32:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.154]:54231) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nz59G-0008Dt-7x; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:32:42 -0400 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1345510fgb.12 for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:32:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qp6f7oqKdltiLOG/bp/xiGBKQyjgacfmH9Qo+RgQgfU=; b=GY1GkCLIdHcTEtyxY/jfi50LHU3l9KB4DwQdVUS4DvG82WhDIfJNws9sCVIugoJI1z wWXHc61ALv+TmWHjXahIMVpASPyBa0b2BjtSCbsc0cW0JoChl2MyJl5xTxSxooRU2wo7 zjAsNqRYl7jpxYa4D/CkKCmccW+pyrJPnQra0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DotU+o02P4+Bu7hGLLO0q/AXQzCAud45oiP9co3oqbbLOOb0AINVYdB8KFxZR52HQy kDsxRBO7orRuMisYf0JeOr5I8Yi0Maj+ph6wa4aTNhe6kaM5aiodt9U750xqf2gXeKJh mFNz7ZlDu5OGkSwtTlqRmapQky4/Ge7KsYBbs= Original-Received: by 10.239.169.18 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 02:32:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87k4slj9mg.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Original-Received: by 10.239.188.200 with SMTP id q8mr650070hbh.26.1270546361116; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:32:41 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123253 Archived-At: On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:57 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > Lennart Borgman writes: > >> Those properties are not mentioned on >> >> =C2=A0 (info "(elisp) Special Properties") >> >> Shouldn't they be listed there? > > 32.19.4 Properties with Special Meanings > ---------------------------------------- > > Here is a table of text property names that have special built-in > meanings. =C2=A0The following sections list a few additional special prop= erty > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^= ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > names that control filling and property inheritance. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Thanks, I see. Maybe it is only me, but I think it is quite easy to miss it. I have looked at the table long ago and "knew" what it was supposed to contain. I think it would be good if all special properties where listed in the table (that is kind of the purpose of it) and that those additional special properties that are not explained there had links to where they are explained.