From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Editing exportet registry files Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 22:34:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: <42C45594.9090207@iue.tuwien.ac.at> <1120201971.42c4ecf37e342@l01.iue.tuwien.ac.at> <85vf3ul8sj.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120426803 11290 80.91.229.2 (3 Jul 2005 21:40:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 21:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 03 23:40:02 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DpCBj-0007Ff-Nn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 23:39:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DpCCu-0002J8-F1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 17:40:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DpCBG-000236-0q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 17:39:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DpCAy-0001wC-6i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 17:38:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DpCAw-0001sI-El for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 17:38:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.106.33.237] (helo=outmail.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1DpCDA-0004T9-2I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 17:41:12 -0400 Original-Received: from wanchan.jasonrumney.net (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j63LZJch028811; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 22:35:19 +0100 Original-Received: from TONKOTSU-RAMEN (tonkotsu-ramen.jasonrumney.net [10.0.0.28]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B540ADDE24; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 22:35:45 +0100 (BST) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Ga=EBtan?= LEURENT's message of "Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:52:51 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40269 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40269 gaetan.leurent@ens.fr (Ga=EBtan LEURENT) writes: > For UTF-16 with signature, I agree, but UTF-8 could sometimes match a > Latin-1 file. For instance, "4=D7=BD=3D2" encoded in Latin-1 is valid as a > UTF-8 string. A friend of mine suggested "Try our new exclusive WAZA=C2=AE > for just $0.02!" which is even meaningful in both cases. Coming up with isolated theoretical problem cases should not stop us from doing what is correct in the other 99% of cases.