From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs snapshot tarball test build Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:43:07 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20070322151036.3000@henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1174653807 26917 80.91.229.12 (23 Mar 2007 12:43:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "djh" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 23 13:43:17 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HUj6z-0006dC-L0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:43:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HUj8t-0008Fv-Ai for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 07:45:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HUj8p-0008EV-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:45:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HUj8m-0008E5-IL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:45:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HUj8m-0008E2-D2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 07:45:08 -0500 Original-Received: from heller.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.23]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HUj6r-0004ns-QE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:43:10 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([81.5.34.178]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id CEM97061 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:43:02 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <20070322151036.3000@henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp> X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68384 Archived-At: > From: "djh" > Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:10:36 +0900 > > I was asked to try out building a snapshot tarball on cygwin and have just finished. Thanks. > Install did not complete successfully, but did install a workable newly built emacs. > > The only problem is shown below (and maybe it is not a real problem). > > -------- > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/emacs-tmp/emacs-22.0.95/leim' > cd lib-src; make maybe-blessmail \ > MAKE='make' archlibdir='/libexec/emacs/22.0.95/i686-pc-cygwin' > make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/emacs-tmp/emacs-22.0.95/lib-src' > ../src/emacs -batch --no-site-file --multibyte -l /usr/src/emacs-tmp/emacs-22.0.95/lib-src/../lisp/mail/blessmail.el > Fatal error (6)make[1]: *** [blessmail] Aborted (core dumped) > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/emacs-tmp/emacs-22.0.95/lib-src' > make: *** [blessmail] Error 2 To me, this looks as an evidence that the Emacs binary you built is unreliable. So I think we should not yet add GCC 4.1.3 to the the 3 safe versions of Cygwin GCC mentioned in PROBLEMS. Thanks for working on this.