From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: arevert-xtra.texi xref gremlin Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 12:55:51 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87hcryfjkh.fsf@zip.com.au> <200704022335.l32NZgOp027657@jane.dms.auburn.edu> <87648efhbs.fsf@zip.com.au> <86ps6m7y36.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <87ircdvlem.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175594160 21001 80.91.229.12 (3 Apr 2007 09:56:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 09:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Romain Francoise Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 03 11:55:57 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HYfk5-00018A-9U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:55:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HYfnD-00080w-5A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 05:59:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HYfn9-00080q-I1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 05:59:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HYfn8-00080c-63 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 05:59:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HYfn7-00080Z-Vd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 05:59:06 -0400 Original-Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.22]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HYfjz-0000zo-52 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 05:55:51 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-124-31.inter.net.il [84.229.124.31]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id GKZ72049 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 3 Apr 2007 12:55:48 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87ircdvlem.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> (message from Romain Francoise on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:48:17 +0200) X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68982 Archived-At: > From: Romain Francoise > Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:48:17 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > They already did: at least one Debian user told me in some forum > > (I think gnu.emacs.help) that "C-h F" and "C-h K" didn't work > > because the manuals were not there. > > C-h F and C-h K are new in Emacs 22 Yes. The person who told me that used the v21.x equivalents "C-h C-f" and "C-h C-k". This doesn't change the essence of the problem, which is that Emacs 21 was shipped without documentation. > and the Emacs 22 package in > Debian (emacs-snapshot) ships all the manuals (for the time being). If they did that once, and on purpose, they can do it again.