From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el] Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 18:27:14 +0300 Message-ID: References: <18486.19302.606327.955538@tfkp07.physik.uni-erlangen.de> <18486.38975.243934.651997@tfkp07.physik.uni-erlangen.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1211642882 14604 80.91.229.12 (24 May 2008 15:28:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 15:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Roland.Winkler@physik.uni-erlangen.de To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 24 17:28:32 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jzvfc-0003GR-1o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 May 2008 17:28:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41805 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jzver-0002Ff-6A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 May 2008 11:27:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jzvel-0002D0-BN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2008 11:27:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jzvei-00027v-L3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2008 11:27:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49706 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jzvei-00027i-E1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 May 2008 11:27:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il ([84.95.2.16]:39836) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jzvef-0007zB-3y; Sat, 24 May 2008 11:27:33 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([80.230.149.132]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0K1D00B2HQ9UE9R0@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Sat, 24 May 2008 18:41:54 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (1203?) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:97648 Archived-At: > From: Richard M Stallman > CC: Roland.Winkler@physik.uni-erlangen.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 10:13:25 -0400 > > Then someone else could reimplement them in > a portable fashion. > > I tend to think it is better to leave this unportable code in Lisp > than to move it to C, because I think the amount of unportable > code in C would be much much more. Now I have a challenge in hand to prove that you are wrong.