From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: commands invoked by the mouse -> commands invoked from the menu bar Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 20:19:48 +0100 Message-ID: References: <446605F9.6020504@student.lu.se> <200605132053.k4DKrMo8006882@jane.dms.auburn.edu> <44667AC9.7050904@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147634512 13685 80.91.229.2 (14 May 2006 19:21:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 19:21:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Luc Teirlinck , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 14 21:21:49 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfMA1-0006EU-Bz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 21:21:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfMA0-0006Ut-Op for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 15:21:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FfM9o-0006UM-7P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 15:21:36 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FfM9k-0006TW-GB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 15:21:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfM9k-0006T6-B6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 15:21:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.106.33.237] (helo=outmail.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FfMBz-0004Sn-PI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 15:23:52 -0400 Original-Received: from wanchan.jasonrumney.net (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B394C82F4; Sun, 14 May 2006 20:21:31 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: from TONKOTSU-RAMEN (tonkotsu-ramen.jasonrumney.net [10.0.0.28]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1671B64; Sun, 14 May 2006 20:21:31 +0100 (BST) Original-To: Lennart Borgman In-Reply-To: <44667AC9.7050904@student.lu.se> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Sun, 14 May 2006 02:33:13 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54455 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman writes: > Maybe the behaviour should be ruled by an option? The behaviour is already ruled by two options (which is one too many IMHO), I don't think we need another one to cover a subtle edge case. We should either fix this by changing the code to match the documentation or the documentation to match the code, after first deciding which is the least surprising/most useful way for it to work.