From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cygwn 5.19 with X-win bootstrap Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:08:03 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20060525133349.1416@henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp> <20060526134758.2944@henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp> <20060530160319.2416@henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp> <20060601135647.3404@henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1149145824 19670 80.91.229.2 (1 Jun 2006 07:10:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 07:10:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 01 09:10:21 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlhJt-0001zA-UG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 09:10:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlhJs-0002aM-PX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 03:10:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FlhIu-0002Sg-36 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 03:09:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FlhIs-0002S4-8W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 03:09:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlhIs-0002Rz-2g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 03:09:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.17] (helo=gandalf.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FlhP3-00043F-Qv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 03:15:34 -0400 Original-Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (nitzan.inter.net.il [192.114.186.20]) by gandalf.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.1-GA) with ESMTP id IWM00482; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 10:09:02 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-208-152.inter.net.il [80.230.208.152]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DNV54162 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 1 Jun 2006 10:08:01 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: "djh" In-reply-to: <20060601135647.3404@henman-np.b-eng.it.to-be.co.jp> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:55537 Archived-At: > Cc: > From: "djh" > Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 13:56:47 +0900 > > Yes. It appears to be a Heisenbug. But, the -O2 flushed it out again. No, I think it's a bug that happens only with optimised code. > Again the backtrace didn't show much. Does anyone wknow would to get a cygwin dll with debuggin information in it? What happens if you repeatedly type "step" until you find yourself in some Emacs function? Once you get to an Emacs function, "bt" should work correctly, and even if it doesn't, we will know in what place Emacs crashes.