From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 22 branch created. Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:29:30 +0300 Message-ID: References: <871wi9jw37.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <462E7B94.3000008@gnu.org> <462F0A07.50104@gnu.org> <864pn4an8j.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <86zm4w97du.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <20070425195026.GA19472@printf.se> <20070427133832.22F374DD5F@rocksteady.printf.se> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177748985 18889 80.91.229.12 (28 Apr 2007 08:29:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:29:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: henrik.enberg@telia.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 28 10:29:40 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HhiJF-0004gh-Vo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:29:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhiPB-0006L7-UI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 04:35:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HhiP9-0006JW-3i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 04:35:43 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HhiP7-0006ID-BP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 04:35:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhiP7-0006IA-6C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 04:35:41 -0400 Original-Received: from heller.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.23]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HhiJ9-0002is-Kf; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 04:29:31 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-2-99.inter.net.il [83.130.2.99]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id CLM00779 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:29:29 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:06:58 -0400) X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70316 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > CC: henrik.enberg@telia.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:06:58 -0400 > > The only other controversy seems to be the encoding stuff. I don't > really understand Richard's objections to what people suggested (i.e., > store the messages undecoded). > > It would require either (1) displaying messages in a separate buffer > or (2) reencoding the text when you move away to display another > message or save the file. I was thinking about #1. This is what Gnus does. > #1 is intolerable because it means C-x b RMAIL RET won't take you > to the current message. Why not? We could arrange for RMAIL to be that separate buffer where we display decoded message text.