From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFA] Console based mouse face highlighting. Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 10:25:05 +0300 Message-ID: References: <17989.37070.393150.565546@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17990.21422.577087.305723@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17990.37305.657724.344516@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17992.53379.953892.751275@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17993.11948.400368.430713@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17994.14013.614407.875104@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17994.32856.216525.50726@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17994.54868.931947.611990@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17995.31640.399794.621018@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17995.53754.860573.633945@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17996.55425.495501.592760@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17998.5626.348375.91578@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1179559529 29978 80.91.229.12 (19 May 2007 07:25:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 07:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Nick Roberts Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 19 09:25:27 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HpJJZ-0003cA-A6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 09:25:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HpJJY-00061O-4u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 03:25:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HpJJT-000615-Te for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 03:25:15 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HpJJS-00060t-Ek for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 03:25:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HpJJS-00060q-9X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 03:25:14 -0400 Original-Received: from romy.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.24]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HpJJQ-0003Av-QV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 03:25:13 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-254-231.inter.net.il [84.229.254.231]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id HWK51561 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 19 May 2007 10:25:05 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <17998.5626.348375.91578@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (message from Nick Roberts on Sat, 19 May 2007 09:09:14 +1200) X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71368 Archived-At: > From: Nick Roberts > Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 09:09:14 +1200 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > I think each approach has pros and cons; it's just a matter of choosing > > > one. > > > > I prefer the separate function approach. > > OK, I'l submit a patch using this one and a ChangeLog if conditions become more > favourable again. After 22.1 I would prefer to have a team of maintainers with > a more formal approval and release process. The current arrangement isn't > working for me, and I see no point in contributing any more if it coninues. Sorry, I don't understand what caused this angry response. Did I say something impolite? if so, I apologize. For the record: I have no formal approval powers; anyone with write access to CVS can install _anything_ they want without asking me, or even against my objections. You asked for my advice, so I gave it to you, but if you disagree with what I say, _I_ cannot prevent you from committing your changes anyway.