From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; RMAIL reading of mail file Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:40:13 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8724-Thu07Feb2008164605+0000-jpff@cs.bath.ac.uk> <18350.404.929683.328844@rgrjr.rgrjr.dyndns.org> <4681-Sun10Feb2008121723+0000-jpff@codemist.co.uk> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202672450 2740 80.91.229.12 (10 Feb 2008 19:40:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, rogers-emacs@rgrjr.dyndns.org To: jpff Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 10 20:41:12 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JOI2w-0002K9-Ly for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:41:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JOI2T-0008Az-GR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:40:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JOI2M-00084O-SE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:40:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JOI2L-00081j-9h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:40:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JOI2L-00081W-1U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:40:25 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JOI2K-0006xb-Vn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:40:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JOI2K-0000vH-Dd for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:40:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JOI2H-0006wh-HB for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:40:24 -0500 Original-Received: from romy.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.24]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JOI2H-0006wK-2z for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:40:21 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([81.5.33.57]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id KEK53293 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:39:54 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <4681-Sun10Feb2008121723+0000-jpff@codemist.co.uk> (message from jpff on Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:17:23 +0000) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88653 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20992 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:17:23 +0000 > From: jpff > Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org > > When I was tracing the operation what I notices was that it has found > a \033 character, and that triggered a call to detect_coding_iso_2022 > on line 7379 on src/coding.c > The detect_coding_iso_2022 looks at all the remaining characters of > the file as far as i could see, via > ONE_MORE_BYTE (c); > switch (c) > > That seemed to get almost to the end of the file (end?) and then > return. The main scan started again until the next \033 when the > whole procedure was repeated, scanning to the end. Could you please post here an example of a file that causes this slowness? Please make it a binary attachment, to protect it from munging by the various mail agents in between. > BTW do you work on rmail in general? I'm not him, but I do use Rmail all the time. > There is a long standing bug with reading mail from two places in > the the same g command Where can I find the details?