From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Documentation for "Clone Buffers" (corrected version)
Date: 21 Mar 2004 07:51:54 +0200
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <uwu5e3fyd.fsf@elta.co.il>
References: <200403181837.i2IIbUV23148@f7.net>
	<E1B4kmk-00056i-2z@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1079848356 24053 80.91.224.253 (21 Mar 2004 05:52:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 05:52:36 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, karl@freefriends.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 21 06:52:28 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1B4vsq-0002fF-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 06:52:28 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1B4vsq-0006fQ-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 06:52:28 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1B4vql-0002p5-VA
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 00:50:19 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30)
	id 1B4vqg-0002os-8e
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 00:50:14 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30)
	id 1B4vqA-0002Pf-F0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 00:50:13 -0500
Original-Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1B4vq9-0002Kl-Q1; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 00:49:42 -0500
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <E1B4kmk-00056i-2z@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard
	Stallman on Sat, 20 Mar 2004 13:01:26 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:20671
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:20671

> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 13:01:26 -0500
> 
>       It's obviously not useful for the user to have to browse
>     through a dir node with 1700 entries from glibc.
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean here.  Are you envisioning the idea that
> the libc manual could create an entry in the info dir for each library
> function?  I see no reason to put them in the info directory

AFAIU, the glibc manual did just that.