From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Patch to allow -nw to runemacs on w32
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:41:54 +0200
Message-ID: <uwt5whajh.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <455B19B9.9000004@student.lu.se>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1163612771 5065 80.91.229.2 (15 Nov 2006 17:46:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 17:46:11 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 15 18:46:07 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GkOoI-0003bO-F1
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:44:30 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GkOoG-00043B-MW
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:44:28 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GkOlt-0001sc-KE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:42:01 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GkOlp-0001nh-Ca
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:42:01 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GkOlo-0001nU-TH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:41:57 -0500
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GkOln-0008Mj-4A
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:41:56 -0500
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-232-158.inter.net.il
	[84.228.232.158]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA)
	with ESMTP id GGP10633 (AUTH halo1);
	Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:41:47 +0200 (IST)
Original-To: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
In-reply-to: <455B19B9.9000004@student.lu.se> (message from Lennart Borgman on
	Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:44:25 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:62347
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/62347>

> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:44:25 +0100
> From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
> 
> In some situations you may want to be able to use the -nw option with 
> runemacs.exe.

What are those situations?  We cannot judge the importance of applying
this patch without knowing when the current behavior is an annoyance.